Sluice vs Lemlist
Lemlist is a multichannel outreach platform: email from $55 a month billed annually, a 650M+ lead database, and add-ons for enrichment, intent signals and LinkedIn, SMS or WhatsApp steps (as of October 2026). Sluice finds people from public signals and scores them against your customer profile. Lemlist is the stronger sequencer; Sluice is the stronger finder.
What Lemlist is good at
Lemlist is a mature sequencer with years of thinking about personalisation and deliverability behind it. One plan puts email, a 650M+ lead database and campaign tooling together, and the Multichannel plan adds LinkedIn, SMS and WhatsApp steps in the same sequence. Its enrichment add-on asks 25+ providers and charges per success. For a team that lives in sequences and wants every channel in one campaign builder, it is a complete, well-worn tool.
Use Lemlist if: Choose Lemlist if outbound sequences are your daily work, you want many channels in one campaign, you send enough to need deliverability tooling, and your targeting is already settled by title and industry. Agencies running repeatable campaigns for many clients will find it familiar and capable.
| Lemlist | Sluice | |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Multichannel outreach sequences | Finding and scoring people, then drafting messages |
| Entry price (as of October 2026) | $55/mo annual, $69 monthly (Email plan) | $9/mo, monthly only |
| Lead source | 650M+ database | Public posts, reviews, ads, hiring, listings, visitors, directory |
| Enrichment misses | Pay per success (add-on, $16–20/mo for 2,000 credits) | Not billed; included in plan credits |
| Intent or signals | Add-on, $21–29/mo per 100 signals | Phrases you write, each with its own hit rate |
| LinkedIn, SMS, WhatsApp | Multichannel plan, $87–109/mo | LinkedIn, Instagram, WhatsApp, email at $10.80/mo per connected account; no SMS |
| Sequence safety | Mature sequence controls | Stops on reply, no, bounce or do-not-contact; weak follow-ups held for review |
| Track record | Established | New, no public reviews yet |
What are you actually buying?
Lemlist's pricing page is a menu: a base plan, then enrichment, then intent signals, then a bigger plan for more channels. That is a fair way to price a toolkit, and it means two Lemlist customers can pay very different amounts for very different products. Sluice has three plans and every feature in a plan is in the plan; what varies is how many lookups you run.
So the useful comparison is not plan against plan. It is the stack you would need to do one specific job.
A monthly cost stack for one job
The job: find 150 people a month who fit your customer profile, get their emails, and run a three-step sequence across email and LinkedIn. Prices are as of October 2026, monthly billing where both offer it.
| Line item | Lemlist | Sluice |
|---|---|---|
| Base plan | Multichannel, up to $109 (includes email) | Working, $39 (3,900 credits; 5,000 the first month) |
| Enrichment | Add-on, up to $20 for 2,000 credits | Included in credits |
| Intent or signals | Add-on, up to $29 per 100 | Included; you write the phrases |
| Sending accounts | Part of the plan | $10.80 each: Gmail plus LinkedIn = $21.60 |
| 150 directory contacts | From the database | $7.50 at 5 cents per reveal, paid from plan credits |
| Rough total | About $158 | About $61, plus any extra lookups |
This is a worked example, not a quote. Lemlist on annual billing is cheaper than the monthly figure, and a Lemlist user might skip intent entirely. The point is the shape: Lemlist charges for channels and add-ons, Sluice charges for connections and lookups. See what a lead actually costs for how to cost your own case.
Database filters against public signals
Lemlist's 650M+ database answers "who has this title at this kind of company?" That is a good question when the job title is the whole story. It is a weak question when every company with that title already gets twenty cold emails a week.
Sluice's question is "who has shown, somewhere public, that they have the problem?" Concretely:
- You write signals: phrases of at least three words, such as "looking for an alternative to" plus your competitor's name.
- Sluice searches public posts on Reddit, LinkedIn, X and others, and reads competitors' reviews on G2, Capterra and Trustpilot.
- Each person is scored 0 to 100 against your profile, with whether the problem looks live now.
- Each signal keeps a record: searches opened, people found, how many cleared 70. Dead phrases get switched off.
Lemlist sells intent as a metered add-on. In Sluice, signals are the core of the product and you can see which ones pay. More on choosing them in buying signals that actually convert.
Where Lemlist is better
- Sequence depth. Years of building campaign logic, conditions and personalisation.
- SMS. Sluice has no SMS step.
- Volume and deliverability. Lemlist is built to send a lot of email and keep it landing. Sluice sends only what you approve, through your own accounts, and has no warmup.
- Maturity. Lemlist has a long track record. Sluice is new and has no public reviews yet.
Where Sluice is better
- Who goes in the sequence. Every person arrives with a score and a link to what they said.
- First messages. Drafts are written from the person's own words; every draft, including one you write, is scored with a reason before it can be queued.
- Stopping. Sequences stop on a reply, a "no", a bounce or the do-not-contact list. A "no thanks" adds the person to that list automatically, and nobody is opened with twice. See follow-up sequences that stop.
- Price you can see. Every pass shows its worst-case price before it runs.
Using both
If you are already happy in Lemlist, there is no reason to leave it. Use Sluice upstream: run your signals, keep the people who score 70 or above, and move them into Lemlist campaigns, carrying the reason they scored as your first line. The handoff is manual today, or through HubSpot if your Lemlist account syncs with it.
The decision
Settled targeting and heavy multichannel sequencing: Lemlist. Unsure who to target, or sending to people who never reply: start on Sluice's Starter plan and see what your best three signals turn up before paying for sequencing add-ons.
Questions people ask
- How much does Lemlist cost?
- As of October 2026 the Email plan is $55 a month billed annually or $69 monthly. Enrichment is an add-on at $16 to $20 a month for 2,000 credits, intent signals $21 to $29 a month per 100, and the Multichannel plan is $87 to $109 a month.
- Does Lemlist charge for failed enrichment?
- Lemlist describes its enrichment add-on as pay per success, across 25+ providers. Sluice also bills only lookups that return something usable.
- Is Lemlist's intent data the same as Sluice's signals?
- No. Lemlist sells intent signals as a metered add-on, per 100 signals. In Sluice a signal is a phrase you write, searched across public posts, reviews and listings, with a record of how many people it found and how many scored 70 or more.
- Can I find leads in Sluice and sequence them in Lemlist?
- Yes, and for heavy multichannel sequencing that is a sensible split. There is no native integration today, so the handoff is manual or through HubSpot if your Lemlist setup syncs with it.
Sources
Try it on your own market
Sluice quotes the worst-case price before anything runs and charges only for lookups that found something, so finding out costs close to nothing.
Get started